Building Production AI Agents: Architecture Patterns
A demo agent and a production agent share a model and almost nothing else. The gap is architecture.
Start with tools, not prompts
The reliability of an agent is bounded by the quality of its tools. A tool should do one thing, validate its own inputs, and return structured output. If a tool can fail silently, the agent will hallucinate around the failure.
Treat every tool like a public API: typed inputs, typed outputs, explicit errors.
Keep the loop bounded
An autonomous loop without limits is an outage waiting to happen. In production:
- Cap the number of steps per task.
- Add a wall-clock and token budget per run.
- Make every step idempotent so a retry cannot double-charge or double-send.
Guardrails are deterministic
The model decides; code enforces. Validate the model's proposed action against hard rules before executing it. Sending money, deleting data, or emailing a customer should pass through a deterministic gate the model cannot talk its way past.
Measure with evals
You cannot improve what you cannot score. Build a small eval set of real tasks with known-good outcomes and run it on every prompt or model change. This is the single highest-leverage habit in agent development.
Escalate to humans
The best production agents know their limits. When confidence is low or the action is irreversible, the agent should escalate to a human with full context rather than guess. Designed well, this makes the system feel more autonomous, not less — because it rarely gets things wrong.
Building something that needs this?
I work with teams as a fractional AI CTO on exactly these problems.
Start a conversation